Blog Archive

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

ARE CASH GIFTS TO TEACHERS APPROPRIATE?

 
The Northwestern Lehigh School board policy committee has taken up the issue of gifts to teachers, coaches, band leaders etc.
 
It has come to the committee's attention that the practice of students giving gift cards by school students to teachers and other school personnel has become prevalent.
 
The debate is whether to limit the amount or to restrict it in  some way.
 
Some suggested it be limited to $25.00  per student.
 
Some would like to eliminate the practice completely.
 
I am sure not all families are in a financial position to give gifts.
 
Are students who are unable to give gifts embarrassed by the practice? 
 
Do students and parents feel compelled to conform to the practice?
 
Are coaches rewarded for play time by some athletes ?
 
I remember the days of apples and thank you cards.
 
Where does a trend like this go over time?
 
Personally I do believe crafts made by students, and cards and letters of appreciation are very appropriate, but I do think that anything over that should be banned by making it a known policy that all other gifts cannot be accepted.  

The school board policy committee meets Monday October 5.
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

ARE WE ON THE VERGE OF A CREDIT COLLAPSE?

 


When Janet Yellen recently decided to not raise interest rates from 0% to 1/4%, it brought about much debate about why this decision was made.
 
Wall Street wanted the raise so it would send a vote of confidence that the economy was improving and asset prices could be bid up further.
 
While this may have temporarily had that effect, higher rates would encourage more flight to U.S. Bonds etc. and possibly raise the value of the dollar further.   With the dollar at all time highs against other currencies. U.S. manufactures and exporters are at an extreme disadvantage now, One example is Caterpillar,  sales are falling and layoffs are increasing.   
 
A little history, the idea of Keynesian economics is  that when an economy slows , lower interest rates, encourage borrowing, and it  will stimulate an economy,  While if inflation increases, raise rates, to slow economic expansion.
 
While this is somewhat oversimplified, it has been the basic tool of the Federal Reserve since WW2.
 
Couple this with what used to be part of basic economics, something called ,The Business Cycle, It was a cycle usually lasting from  7 to 10 years where the economy expanded, debts increased, then prices increased, sometimes some shortages started to appear, interest rates were raised, the  economy slowed, risky or speculative investments failed, bad debts liquidated, followed by a resetting and then the next expansion.

Kept some discipline and fear over debt in everyone's mind.
 
Again an oversimplification but the basic idea.

Our Money has had no backing by assets since 1964, and our last Balanced  Federal Budget was 1969. This has allowed Federal spending  and indebtedness to go unchecked.
 
In the 1970s we had several recessions caused by oil shortages, caused by oil embargoes from the middle East.  They were relatively short in duration but under President  Carter and Arthur Burns the Federal Reserve over compensated and inflation soared to double digits.
 
Toward the end of his term Carter replaced Burns with  Paul Volker,  Reagan was elected in 1980,  interest rates were raised to  17%,  In 1981 we entered a severe recession, with a recovery taking hold in 1983. followed by over 17 years of lowering interest rates and economic expansion.  Interest rates finally settled to around 5 or 6 %. The period was an expansion with stable inflation and steady growth.
 
While there was a slight downturn in the early 90's, and the nasdaq  collapse in 2000, which was basically caused by over purchasing of computers for Y2K. and the inevitable decline of that market when demand collapsed.
 
It retrospect it became the policy of the Federal reserve under  Greenspan and Bernanke to immediately lower rates and stimulate spending and debt whenever there was  attempt by the market to correct and wash out malinvestment and bad debts.
 
By refusing to allow the normal business cycle to run its course,  Debts began to build in all sectors of the economy, Federal, State, Corporate, Mortgages and personal debt.
 
Then came 9/11/2001 .  The government flooded the economy with easy credit.  And the quickest and easiest way was to subsidize mortgages through Fanny Mae.  Force banks through laws such as the Community Reinvestment act to make unsound loans.

I recall in 2004 or 2005,  the banks were paying 5 to 6 % on a 1 year CD and you could get a 30 year mortgage with no down payment, for 5%.   Anyone who cared knew that something was wrong..
 
Since sound minded Local Banks were not enthusiastic about holding these loans , they were sold to Fanny-Mae, other Govt. Agencies  and  Wall street, who bundled these mortgages into investment packages.  Real-estate Mutual funds etc.,   some paid handsome dividends.
 
We know that banks and wall Street were  encouraged to do this by the Community Investment Law. but I also wonder if  they were not also assured that they would be protected if things went wrong.   
 
Real-Estate boomed, priced increased on existing homes by 50%, in very short time. Houses sprung up like mushrooms in the fall. Everyone was either buying, flipping or investing in real-estate.
 
The economy also boomed in anything to do with housing, furnishings etc.
 
Commodity prices soared, copper went from &1.00 lb. to $4.00 plywood from $6.00 a sheet to $12 to $15.00.   I recall these prices because I was building a house before this went crazy and was aware of the increases.
 
Finally oil hit $150.00 barrel, gas to $4.00 a gallon. and people who had over purchased houses began to be squeezed by the higher prices and could no longer manage their debts.
 
The first to implode was the so called sub-prime loans,  these were loans that should most likely never have been made.
 
It set off a cascade, as Real-Estate prices declined , more people went underwater, and a viscous Credit Collapse was started.
 
It all came to head when exits from money markets and the stock market reached a point were in a few days it would have been irreversible. Government stepped in and insured all funds up to $200,000. and helped to halt the carnage.

I remember watching Bernanke explain, that the answer was to stimulate the economy with easy credit till asset prices recovered.

Rather than let  controlled and systematic  bankruptcies to eliminate the bad debts and investments, the decision was made to keep increasing debt, rather than endure the pain.
 
Interest rates were lowered to 0. and here we are today.
 
Now 8  years later we are still at 0%.
 
We have seen QE1,QE2,QE3, and now there is talk of QE 4 . although it has not really accomplished anything but run up the stock market, the bond market and the debt of every country in the world.
 
Quantitative easing is nothing more that the Federal Reserve making a book entry from the Fed to the Treasury Department  for Trillions of Dollars of Debt, or buying Treasury bonds.  Of course the Federal Reserve creates these Trillions with a stroke of a pen. Common sense tells me that this is just crazy stuff.
 
The other thing talked about by some , Citi Bank President, Swiss treasury officials and many other economists,  is an attempt to go to negative interest rates.  Where bank deposits would be taxed in a slow economy and sales taxed in an overheated economy. This would necessitate the elimination of cash to stop people from withdrawing their money to avoid the tax.

Citi-bank would love if they could get 2% on every transaction and Government could view every transaction.

I guess we would all need a smart phone and a card reader, even to go to yard sales or bake sales.

I do believe and hope there will be overwhelming resistance to this.

It seems that every country in the world is in a slow down and heading to a recession.,  Commodity prices are declining, creating job losses in natural resources and in equipment sales.

Real-Estate has recovered , but is still not to pre-crises levels even with 3.5% mortgages.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Government Debt has exploded ,  China has debt of 300% of GDP, Japan $200 % of GDP, USA, 110% of GDP,  all higher than Greece's debt levels.

There has been a race to the bottom in most countries to lower the value of their currencies to increase exports,  and yet there sales are declining.

Retail sales in most of the USA have been flat or down.

The world is saddled with excess debt.

It will start with defaults in emerging markets, followed by  bankruptcies expanding around the world.

With interest rates at unheard of low levels, stimulation by lowering interest rates, and increasing debt will not be the answer.

It looks more and more that  the  market will rule, and the real answer is to allow the laws of finance and money to do its work of  eliminating excessive debts and bad investments.  This will now be very painful and prolonged,  but it is probably inevitable.

We will need Governments and Politicians to be honest and clear ,  and if they are credible they can gain the trust and cooperation of the nation and  we can overcome this.

If they promise quick fixes and more bail-outs, and intervention.  it could be decades of decline and unrest worldwide.

 
 
I
 
 
 
 

 

Saturday, September 26, 2015

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL RETIREMENT PLAN EXPLAINED

In conversations with members of the public it is obvious most people don't know or understand how the Pennsylvania teachers retirement plan works.

I hope to lay out the basics of this plan in a clear and simple way. I will also, at a later time look at the other public pension plans in the state, as well as the pensions of elected officials and judges.

The teachers pension system was enacted in 1917,  and was left mostly unchanged until the 1970's.

In the next three decades retirement eligibility age was lowered, the multiplier was increased, and other expansions added.

The system came under stress after the 2008 recession when income from investments dropped, and value of investments declined. It has recovered some, but is now underfunded by $35.1 billion .

It is now approaching crisis level, with annual contribution of school districts set at 21.4% for 2014-2015, and expected to go to 25.84 in 2015-2016. That was before the recent decline in the stock market. The state is supposed to reimburse 50% of employer contributions to the school district.

Retirees are in 4 groups.

TC- hired before 1983, 2.5 multiplier, full retirement after 35 years of service. or at age 60 over 30 years of service. early retirement loses 3% per year of full value max. 15% . pays 6.25% contribution. Vested after 5 years.

TD- hired after 1983, same as above but personal contribution is 7.5% of salary.

TE- hired after 2011, 2 multiplier, 7.5% to 9% contribution, depending on performance of fund. full retirement at 65, or 35 years of service and 57 years of service. any combination to equal 92. Vested after 10 years.

TF- hired after 2011, 2.5 multiplier, 10.3% to 12.3% contribution, depending on performance of fund.
other details same as TE.

All These values are to be reevaluated every 5 years.

Examples of  benefits for Northwestern Lehigh Teachers.

TC or TD class,  78,000 x.025 x 30 yrs service =  $58,500 annual benefit
                                                  x 35 yrs             =  $68,250.
                                                  x 40 yrs             =  $78,000.

These benefits could be more, if the teacher has extra pay for activities etc., some have stipends in excesses of $10,000 per year.

Administration and principles are also included in this plan. They earn between $100,000 and $140,000 annually; the benefits would act accordingly.

With the 401 type plan that most people have, their retirement benefit is dependent on the performance of the investments.

With this defined plan by the state, any shortfalls in investment return is guaranteed to be made up by the taxpayers through the real-estate tax.

Since this plan was introduced and administrated by the state, this pension plan should be removed
from the school budget and funded by the state. This would relieve some of the burden on property owners and spread it out among all its citizens.






Tuesday, September 22, 2015

 State Public Pension Fund crisis

 
 Pension funds across the U.S. are wrestling with how much risk to take as they look to fulfill mounting obligations to retirees, and the fortunes of most are still heavily linked with the ebbs and flows of the global markets. State pension plans have nearly three-quarters, or 72%, of their holdings in stocks and bonds, according to Wilshire Consulting.
• Public pension funds are nervous about losing money…
Because they’ve made promises they can’t possibly keep.
Public pensions manage retirement money for government workers. Many teachers, firemen, and police have public pensions. If you’re a taxpayer living in a state that has public pensions, part of your tax bill goes toward these pensions.
According to think tank State Budget Solutions, state pensions are currently underfunded by $4.7 trillion. “Underfunded” is the difference between what they promise to pay and the amount of money they have on hand to actually pay it.
Public pensions can’t possibly make up that huge gap. It would require taxing $15,000 from every man, woman, and child in America. And the gap grows every year (it was $4.1 trillion last year).
Some states are already on the brink. Illinois only has enough money to cover 22% of its promised payments. Illinois will have a pension crisis. The only question is “when?”
Pennsylvania's Fund is only 62% funded,  unfunded by $35.1 billion.
Public pensions are a slow motion train wreck that can’t be stopped. Millions of workers who expect a steady stream of income when they retire will get nothing. The U.S. public pension system is mathematically guaranteed to crash.
•  How’d this happen?
Some states simply promise ridiculously huge pensions to public workers. According to Forbes, the average annual pension promised to a CalSTRS teacher who worked from age 23 to 65 is over $110,000 per year. That’s more than double the average income for an entire family of four in the U.S.
Another reason is that state pensions use pie-in-the-sky estimates for how much their investments will earn. According to the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA), U.S. public pensions expect to earn 8% per year on average.
That’s a wildly optimistic number. They’re extremely unlikely to earn anything close to 8% per year.
 Returns on both bonds and stocks will likely be low or negative for the next many years. With interest rates at historic lows, bonds barely pay anything. And U.S. stocks have very little upside because ,because there so expensive today.
Expecting returns to average 8% per year going forward is foolish. And we’re not the only ones who think so. BlackRock (BLK), the world’s largest asset manager, says state and local pensions should expect to earn 4% per year or less going forward.
The average public pension earned just 3.4% last year. And Bloomberg Business reports that the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest pension fund in the U.S., earned just 2.4% last year.

Saturday, September 12, 2015

       

                                         WELCOME

     Welcome to the Northwestern Lehigh Observer,  we hope to attempt to keep the residents of the area informed on issues that are of interest to the community.                                                                                                                                                                          We will be posting news, information and opinion,  We will accept comments and opinion from members of the community.  We hope that they will be kept concise and to the point.               
 
     We are hoping to have reports on all the Townships, School District, County and State Issues that affect the area. As well as Federal issues that are relevant.
 
     We will also post and accept opinion on almost any subject.
 
      All postings will be at the discretion of the editor.