JAN. 6, HEARING IS A ONE SIDED POLITICAL INFOMERCIAL
A "HEARING" WOULD HAVE WITNESSES FOR THE DEFENSE
The Jan.6 hearings are a gigantic political and hollywood production without any opportunity for witnesses to bring evidence contrary to the assumptions portrayed by this biased partisan committee.
There is no ability to bring opposing evidence into view. There is no cross examination of witnesses.
Pelosi only allowed Republicans on the committee who embraced her narrative and only 2 could be found. One is Liz Chaney whose family 's idea of foreign policy was contradicted by Trump and is hoping to preserve the family legacy.
All republicans who were put forth as members of the committee were rejected by Pelosi. She is in fact acting like a judge. She is not a judge.
This committee was assembled contrary to many rules of the House.
Much of the testimony and videos are not in context and often edited. Thousands of witnesses and hundreds of hours of video and we only see what this committee wants us to see.
There is no mention of Pelosi or the Mayor of DC who were instrumental in the preparations for the security for this rally. No mention of Trump and others recommending 10,000 to 20,000 national guard to be on hand, which was rejected by Pelosi and the DC Mayor.
It is an intentional and contriverd effort to damage Donald Trump, not to examine the true facts around this rally that became a riot.
It is in fact an illegitimate committee, not in the spirit of the legal system of this country and a disgrace heaped upon the other disgraces brought by the democrats, the media and government agencies.
They themselves are the true danger to democracy.
We're not on the same page on this topic, I do find a seditious element to Jan. 6., BUT, let's put that aside for current events... Trump still lingers on about the stolen election. Part of an election effort is having monitors in place, to make sure the count is correct as possible at every district and that subsequent tallies reflect those observations. If you fail in that organizational effort, to still speculate 18 months later about the validity of the election is a disservice to democracy.
ReplyDeleteMy article was to question the legitimacy and fairness of this hearing, It is 100% one sided without any ability to question the presentations.
ReplyDeleteas for elections, I question if it possible to insure fair elections, as long as we have mail in ballots and cannot really verify who is sending these in. Mail in voting has opened up the possibility of election fraud and if it can be done it will be done.
Then we also have the courts changing the rules for ballots after election day. all these things questions the ability to have a fair election.