Dems distract from Obama's failures

SWITCH DEBATE FROM ISLAMIC TERRORISM TO GUN CONTROL

MEDIA AND DEMOCRATS STILL COVERING FOR OBAMA

  

Using the usual tactics, the democrat activists, with the assistance of the media, are shifting the debate about the failures of the Obama administration concerning Islamic terrorism to gun control. This is an attempt to shield Hillary Clinton, who needs to support the Obama Legacy. This cover-up on terrorism started with the shooting at Fort Hood, which was labeled workplace violence, then Benghazi, which it was blamed on a internet video. Next, the San Bernardino shooting was characterized as "just an isolated incident" and then Orlando. They edited the 911 call transcripts, claiming it was a hate crime against LGBT people, and the rhetoric has now moved to "we have too many guns." There were many other lesser incidents that have been labeled as workplace violence and attributed to a "mentally unstable" person including slashing's in New York City, the beheading of a woman in the mid-west and others - all in an attempt to minimize the terrorist threat. 

Barak Obama and his policies have been the cause of the worst division in recent American history, not only at home but around the world. I ask, could anyone have created this much unrest and division by accident?  Race relations in America are worse now at anytime since the 1960's. But then Oh! the glory days of the 1960's. If you listen to the older media people, Hillary Clinton, Chris Matthews and others, they remember with great nostalgia when they were students who organized and participated in sit-ins, demonstrations, no bras, and pot smoking. It was the best days of their lives and they are getting their chance to relive their youth...though I bet they will skip the bra part.

The problem is many people are dying - a dozen every weekend in Chicago alone. Police officers have been used as foils for their political agenda and are being assassinated at the greatest rate in history. The police have drawn back from customary crime control methods, due to fear of jail or lawsuits from an activist Attorney General's Office. The borders have not been secured and immigration law has not been enforced, and illegal criminal felons have been released back into society at an alarming rate. The Obama administration has allowed over 800,000 immigrants (the true number if you count illegals is probably over 1 million) from the Middle East and predominantly Muslim African countries and is proposing to bring in more. If only a small fraction of these people are jihadists, it may very well send this country into a downward social spiral. But that type of chaos and crisis is an opportunity for political revolutionaries, who fundamentally want to change America. Their answer, of course, is more gun control for American citizens. On a border where heroin is being brought in by the truck load, does anyone doubt that any amount of guns that someone wants can be also be brought in. As far as the price of heroin being so low and more easily available for underage youth than beer. Is this just an accident?

We have a private sector economy that has the lowest growth rate in history, the lowest worker participation rate (62% - which means almost 4 out of 10 Americans are not working!), the largest number of families on food stamps (almost 50%). Regulation and red tape have hamstrung small business and sent larger businesses out of the country. While the government sector has been protected, how long can that last?

We have no-fly lists and terrorists watch lists with millions of names. BUT the process that places people on the list - how people are selected to be on this list- and what you do if you are on the list, are secret. What has been revealed is that over 90% of the people on the list are not U.S. citizens. Why in the world do we allow suspected terrorists who are not citizens to remain in the country? I know that federal law allows guns to be sold not only to green card residents, but also to temporary visitors. If we deported all non-residents on these lists, this would cut the number of people the FBI needs to monitor to a manageable level and maybe they would have a better chance to follow up on the real terrorists. But that is not the intent of political opportunists who want to disarm the American public.

We now see that these activists who have attacked law enforcement and Americans' constitutional rights, and who have failed to enforce most laws that define us as a country, have now set out to disregard the rules of the Congress and to disrupt the workings of Congress. Their intention is chaos and division in the quest for more political power.