"New World Order", 1991 vs 2022

BIDEN'S USE OF THE PHRASE "NEW WORLD ORDER" IS JUST A REMINDER OF THE GOAL OF GLOBAL GOVERNMENT 

IT MAY INDICATE A NEW PERIOD OF DEATH AND DESTRUCTION RATHER THAN PEACE

Joe Biden reached back in history to again use the phrase "New World Order" to describe the unified alliance of the western countries against Russia. He touted that this new order would be lead by the United States. While this phrase was used originally by Woodrow Wilson shortly after WW1 as an indication of a promised period of peace, it was followed within 2 decades by WW2.  It was again used by George Bush on Sept. 11. 1990, this was followed by 30 years of death, destruction and regime change brought about the idea that 1 nation or a group of nations could fashion the world in the image of their desire through power politics.

The dream of controlling other countries by an all powerful alliance of countries is a dream in the making for over 100 years. Its record while often touted, has a very mixed result, especially when viewed from the prism of those countries who have been the object of that control. 

It is clear that the alliance that orchestrated the treaty of Versailles set the stage for WW2 which led to the greatest volume of death and destruction in human history.

Shortly after Bush's infamous touting of this "New World Order" we witnessed the intrigue, manipulation and power politics of regime change for the next 30 years. A policy that destroyed almost every government in the middle east, killed a million civilians and created the biggest migration and population  displacement since WW2, and it continues today. 

The world has changed dramatically since Bush made his famous proclamation.

In 1991, the Soviet Union was no longer a threat to world peace, it was the end or maybe just a suspension of the advance of world communism. The New Russian federation was working to find its place in the world and hoped to incorporate into the world economy. Today, in 2021 it is more alienated and separated from the western world than ever. Today's Russia is actually a product of Bush's new world order.

In 1991, China was still a third world developing country it was not a threat to the western world either economically or militarily. Today it may be the most dominant manufacturing country ever and is also becoming a world military power.

In 1991, the middle east countries were divided and unaware of the dangers from this New World Order. Today they are aware and more unified among themselves in an effort to stay clear of dangerous alliances that can only put them into the middle of global power politics. They are on their way to actually forming their alliance of neutrality from the rest of the world.

Today we see others who at one time had a great deal of trust and admiration for the United States clearly wary of becoming entangled into this New World Order. Mostly in fear that they will become and object of the order's attention in the future. You can count India, South Africa and others who are resisting becoming part of a global alliance and hoping to live as neutral countries.

Then there is the United States, the leader of this "New World Order" In 1991, probably the the world's leader in manufacturing, finance and entertainment. A positive image in the world, including with the new Russian federation. Many of our capitalist industries copied by the New China. A country with a  history of trust and fair play that was an asset better than money. Today that has mostly all been thrown away in the quest of using the position as the only superpower to fashion the world for the benefit of, it is not clear who. A military that was feared, because it was an unknown entity that was seldom used.

No longer a manufacturing economy, but consumer economy, paid for with ever depreciating dollars generated by an government who believes there is no limit to deficit spending. Divided into opposing camps of those who long for the United States of old and those who are hell bent on transforming the country into a third world type socialist disaster. A product of this new world order that no longer recognizes the rights of individuals, but instead touts the benefits to an all powerful government and new society, that desires to destroy an vestige of religion, morality and the family and replaced it with a disgusting society where the government defines what is right and wrong. Dissent is to be crushed by censoring, shunning, cancelling and denouncing now, and you can bet by violence in the future. 

A divided country is a weak country. If we objectively take stock of our country we are a shadow of our former self. We are not trusted by much of the world, we are not respected by much either. We still have the power of force and free money, but even that is now becoming in question. 

Yes, it appears we are on the verge of a "New world order", but I believe it will not be the alliance of 1991, but a new alliance made up of the manufacturing, natural resource wealthy countries with young eager populations who are focused on transforming work into wealth and watching the self orchestrated decline of the former.