Genius act, Stablecoin and U.S. debt.

 MORE KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD

MODERN METHOD OF EXPANDING DEBT

While many understand that the debt problem in the United States cannot be solved without a change in fiscal policy, a change requiring more responsibility, it seems the latest scheme is to finance more debt by the use of Stablecoin.

This law was passed in July 2025 and the idea is that those licensed to promote Stablecoin, big banks, will issue 1 Stablecoin for 1 dollar, not a real coin, but a digital entry for as many coins that one wants to purchase. It is in reality a digital coin or crypto currency that can be used to purchase items or services from anyone who is willing to accept them. Its positive is that it could allow users to skip using credit cards that has fees to the receiver in electronic transactions. I would expect the government will encourage it use and allow it to be used for government transactions.

These stable coins would be exchanged for dollars on demand from the issuer. The issuers would have to keep the reserves in dollars or U.S. treasury debt. The issuer would be able to profit by the interest earned on the assets held. 

The plan is hoped to allow the U.S. to continue engaging in deficit spending by opening up a new approach for finding buyer for U.S. debt. Stablecoin buyers would provide the financing and the providers would earn the interest, at least as long as those payments can be made.

One wonders what may happen when debt is bought by the providers and suddenly many want to exchange their Stablecoins for dollars, thus requiring a sale of Treasury debt. 

The other part of the plan is that it will require the use of dollars and also hope to prop up the use the dollar as an international currency.

Again, it is hoped to support the ability of the government to continue to engage in deficit spending that will continue to increase the debasement of the currency and hence a rise in inflation. It also hopes to encourage the demand for those increased dollars for use in the scheme rather than making the dollar a sound store of value.

Time will tell if this plan will be successful, while it does have the power and influence of the U.S. government to promote this, many are now aware of such ideas and it will become common knowledge around the world in a short time.

Sooner or later the debt crisis will need to be addressed, hopefully in a responsible and moral way. It seems no one is willing to endure the pain that responsibility may require and all efforts to kick the can down the road will just make solutions more difficult and more painful.

Expanded Mideast war may be inevitable.

 LOTS OF PLAYERS NOW READY TO GO

LOOKS LIKE END OF PASSIVE SPECTATORS

This week seems to have been a turning point in the Mideast situation. Israel's attack on Qatar and their doubling down on voicing their right to attack anyone, may be the impetus for a large scale multifront conflict, possibly within weeks, if not days. 

In last week's meeting in Qatar the voiced result was economic sanctions on Israel, but the closed door military meetings were never made public. Directly after, Saudi Arabia and nuclear capable Pakistan signed a comprehensive mutual defense treaty insuring they will be all out allies in any future military conflict. 

Egypt, in effect, has scrapped its 50 year treaty will Israel. Israel has been complaining that Egypt has moved 40,000 troops and other resources into the Sinai, a non militarized zone, according to the treaty. Egypt this weekend told Israel any plan to push people from Gaza into the Sinai will result in war. Some in Israel believe that Sinai should be part of Israel, Egypt has made it clear it is part of Egypt.

It seems everyone expects Israel to resume hostilities with Iran within the coming weeks. In the last few days Iran has again rejected nuclear watchers from the IAEA from entering Iran as they actually were instrumental in Israel's targeting the assassination of Iran's nuclear scientists and their families in June. This will be used as an excuse for the planned attack.

Israel is complaining to the U.S. about Turkey's rhetoric toward Israel, asking for intervention by Trump.  The reality is that it seems the situation is ripe for a widespread conflict at any time, only a dramatic new diplomatic effort can cool off the situation.  It would probably need some concessions from Israel, which seems unlikely. Netanyahu is headed for Washington again, most likely expecting Washington's assurance that it will come to their military assistance in case of war.

With Zelensky also heading to Washington in hopes for security guarantees, it may be time for Trump to to have to make some clear signals as to Washington's commitments. I suspect Zelensky will not get guarantees from Trump, Netanyahu probably, but with concessions. 

You have many in the U.S., in the Christian community, who are diehard supporters of Israel, believing that modern Israel is a creation of god and that its existence will be preserved by divine intervention, if necessary. They believe that an all out conflict will bring about the return of the messiah, Jesus Christ. Some Jews also believe that a messiah will preserve the state of Israel. There are some in the Muslim community, who also have a similar belief, but with different results.

I would expect a different result would be devastating test of their faith. We must remember that Israel, with a population possibly with similar beliefs, was destroyed over 2500 years ago. Is it possible that Armageddon with a biblical view always viewed from Jerusalem, could be a regional event rather than a global event?

Also remember that the Jews of Christ's time rejected a spiritual savior in favor of their hope of a warrior savior. Is Netanyahu their warrior savior today? 

Russia and China's blended economic systems are working for them.

 COPYING U.S. SUCCESSES, PLUS INOVATION

U.S. PROVED THE VALUE OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM

I believe the U.S. constitution and the freedom it provided to its citizens is the time tested best system, if it is strictly followed. The reality is the U.S. system has been plagued with top down government control and central planning by bureaucratic and regulatory control. American cars may be built by independent companies but regulations severely regulate design and stifle innovation. Small business and entrepreneurship is almost made impossible by zoning and regulatory costs. The small foundries and machine shops have almost become extinct in this country. These were the business's that made rapid shifts to increased production possible in former times.

I don't fully understand all the polices of Russia's economic system, but it seems to be a 3 tiered system. At the top is government control of natural resources which provide capital to 2nd tier manufacturing companies which many are privately controlled. The 3rd tier is small business, retail and other individually owned business which it seems to be free to innovate and make their own decisions. It was interesting that many of these small business were able to quickly repurpose to make components for Russia's drone production. One making wooden propellers, others making the frames or wiring harnesses, often small business's with a handful of workers, very similar to what was possible in the U.S. in former times.  

In China, the Chinese Communist party is very much in control, but many of the businesses are free to innovate, make profits and their owners and workers to prosper. The party rule seems to be, you can make as much money as you want, but do not attempt to become involved in politics, the consequences can be severe. The party has copied the system of the U.S. in former times where originally the branches of the federal reserve were free to set interest rates and provide capital to business in their areas. That system in the U.S. has morphed into primarily funding the national debt. In China funding is available for innovative and growing companies.

While many believe that the Chinese are working at slave labor rates, the reality is this system, has in a short time, brought a huge number of its citizens out of poverty. The savings rate of Chinese average near 30%. While the U.S. has always been an example for many around the world, many third world countries are now looking at the progress and opportunities that are displayed by China and others.

While both countries have moved away from totalitarian communism, it has been evolutionary process that one can expect has not yet been completed. Much of what happens in these countries is also influenced by the real or perceived threats brought against them by outside forces.

In many ways western capitalism has moved more toward central planning by regulation and a blending of big business and government that traditionally was labelled fascist.  Big Government regulation requires big business to lobby to protect their interests with money and influence. Legislation can promote some business and eradicate others. I suspect the cost of government in the west is far higher than either of the former communist countries. When government is the biggest player in the country it never ends well.

While the internet has bypassed many of the costs and regulations in the U.S., it has been bright spot, allowing entrepreneurs to conduct business from their homes and garages in a fashion reminiscent of former times. I suspect that this is a world wide phenomenon. 

The reality is that economies of countries around the world are evolving at a quick pace and those who are hindered from innovation and adapting will fall along the wayside.

Russia to launch satellite based internet service.

 SIMILAR TO MUSKS, "STARLINK" 

WILL SATELITE BASED SYSTEMS DOMINATE IN THE FUTURE

Russia has announced that they have completed their testing phase of their satellite based internet system. They have announced the first satellites will be launched in December and within 2 years they will have 1200 satellites in space. It is expected it will be able to offer service to many remote areas and particularly in the global south. Of course, one can understand that Russia is vast and such a system will be very useful in connecting their country.

Starlink is now available in 140 countries and has over 6 million users, Its cost has been declining and one can expect that this approach will not only provide internet but entertainment, telephone and other information. It has both civilian and military capabilities. 

The Russian system will provide communications to Asia, Africa and other places now having limited communication systems. 

The move to streaming and other electronic communications may make cable and other wire type systems obsolete in the future, but there may be the risk of the ability to cut service very easily and quickly.

The Russian system is reported to be a laser based system that may be actually  more reliable than the present Starlink system, but not being an expert on these things we will surely see a debate about this in the future.

The people I know with Starlink view it very favorably and the system is compact,  and can be used during travel in multiple homes and remote locations. 

Russia has experience and technology with rocketry to efficiently put such a service in operation. They may partner with China to manufacture the home terminals in large quantities. It will be interesting if anyone else will want, or be able, to compete with these 2 systems that may dominate communications in the future.

Are Ukraine counter offensives sustainable?

 UKRAINE  CONFICT  INTENSIFIES 

SHIFTING TROOPS TO STOP RUSSIAN ADVANCES 

For the last year, Russia has been in the process of advancing in all areas of the eastern front. Ukraine has slowly been pushed back and has been in danger of effectively being cut off in many of these areas. The situation is dire in the Pokrovsk area. In recent day Ukraine has shifted troops from other areas to slow and even retake some of the ground in this area. They have also moved troops to strengthen the Zaporizhzhia area. It seems some of these troops are also their elite troops who have been in the Kiev area. It may be a desperate attempt to slow and neutralize the Russian advance.

Recently it has been reported that Russian reconnaissance squads have crossed the Dnieper river in the Kherson region and found little resistance, obviously the troops from this region have been moved elsewhere. Russia does not hesitate to withdraw to defensive positions if counter attacked, but usually brings up additional resources that eventually prevail. It is expected that Russia is going to cross the Dnieper and reopen the Kherson attack and threaten Odessa, which would require Ukraine moving troops that they do not have.

At the same time Russia has made massive aerial attacks on munition depots and energy supplies all across Ukraine. It appears that Russia is not going to engage in Blitzkrieg attacks or defeat Ukraine with overwhelming attacks. One must conclude that they do not expect to militarily defeat every major city, but just keep up the war of attrition until Ukraine can no longer resist. While this could happen in the near future, interviews of Russian military leaders expect that they may be fighting for another year. This would fulfill the Russian objective of making the  Ukrainian army non threatening in the future.

It is unlikely that Ukraine can replace its troops, nor can NATO keep up with replacing the loss of equipment and supplies. The European economies are steadily deteriorating and neutral countries are unwilling to commit economic suicide to weaken Russia. Then there is the reality that other BRICS countries, especially China, will not sit by, even if defeating Russia would be possible. Escalation will bring a response that may be far worse than what is happening now. It is time to end this for the sake of the poor people of Ukraine, Russia and the world.

 

 

Arab and Islamic leaders meet in Doha.

 REPRESENTITIVES OF 57 COUNTRIES MEET TO DISCUSS ISRAEL

ASIAN, MIDDLEAST, AFRICA AND FAR EAST LEADERS

Yesterday an emergency summit was held in Doha, Qatar prompted by the Israeli attack on Doha, Qatar. These attendees were made of members of Arab League, Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the Gulf Cooperation council. While the complete cooperation statement has not yet been officially released, it seems they have agreed to jointly increase economic pressure on Israel. Some of the major members are expected to have private meetings to form some sort of joint defense agreement, similar to NATO. 

Much of the emphasis was on the continuing plight of the citizens in Gaza and the general chaos and instability caused by this ongoing crisis. Contrary to the existing narrative, while many are not supporters of an Israeli state, they are not advocating the destruction of Israel as has been the situation in decades past. It is clear that like most governments today they are emphasizing economic cooperation and mutual prosperity. The ongoing crisis in Gaza is disrupting those objectives for everyone in the region.

The focus was intense and without redeeming narrative on Benjamin Netanyahu and his government, especially since Netanyahu has publicly stated that Israel will continue attacks on any nation that harbors Hamas. So far, no one is advocating military action against Israel, but they all desire some kind of conclusion to the ongoing crisis. Diplomatic relations between these attendees and Israel are now at an all time low.

Before the Hamas organized attack on Israel 2 years ago, relations may have been at an all time high.  Hamas was becoming increasingly irrelevant and garnered little support by these countries. Even Iran was moving to a more main street position by improving relations with others in the region and focusing more on economic prosperity. That all changed after the Hamas attack and the situation in Israel may be the worst for the state of Israel in its history. The response by Israel has been more damaging to Israel than the attack itself and there is no end in sight.

While some want to declare this situation as an organized and cooperative assault on Israel, all parties attacked Israel after their incursion and destruction of Gaza. It seems now that all parties are committed and cannot find an off ramp. Attacking those who attempt at some sort of negotiations is a bad policy and cannot help end this situation.

Any objective observer must conclude that Israel is in a far more dire situation now than they were before the Hamas attack. Doubling down will not make anything better.

Trump, don't count on US to aid war.

 CAN TRUMP AVOID PRESSURE FOR MORE WAR?

CAN NATO COMPLY WITH TRUMP'S DEAL?

In the last few days we have seen the possibility of escalating war increase, both in Ukraine and Israel. In Europe we see hysteria over unarmed Russian drones that entered Polish and Romanian airspace. Russia volunteered to have meetings with the Polish military to discuss this, but Poland refused. It is still possible that this is all a false flag event engineered by Ukraine, but if so, also encouraged by NATO members. 

We also see riots in the UK and France, who often talk about troops and war, but are not likely to be any position to actually bring it to reality. One must suspect that they are covertly hoping that they can entice Poland to put troops in Ukraine, they would offer verbal encouragement. Then there is the push to rearm Germany, a dangerous effort for many reasons. I suspect that they would also hope to give support in case of war with Russia. The reality is that there will not be an escalation of the war in Ukraine without a U.S. commitment and it does not look that is going to happen.

Trump poo-pooed the hysteria over unarmed drones, then offered his deal for more sanctions on Russia. He told NATO that he is willing to increase sanctions and tariffs on Russian oil buyers, if NATO members will stop buying all oil originating in Russia, I suspect that they economically cannot. They would also have to put 100% tariffs on China, again an economic impossibility. It is clear, Trump has no intention of being dragged into a war with Russia. 

In the middle east, the Arab counties, including Egypt, are meeting today and it seems they are going to agree to form a cooperative army to counter Israel's expanded strikes on other countries, in its effort to defeat Hamas. The latest strike on Qatar seems to have been sort of the last straw. Trash talking by Israel against Turkey and Egypt have increased tensions with both counties and the imminent attack on Iran may very well unify the opposition to Israel. The reality is that Hamas is not popular with any of these countries, but there populations are increasingly outraged at the GAZA situation. Israel has lost even its weak support from Egypt and Jordan, and it seems the rest of the world, except the U.S.. It may be that Israel needs to change direction or it is possible that any further escalation will be met with unified military action.

Again, without U.S. commitment, Israel will need to change some of its policies, if not its government.  I suspect that Trump understands that an escalated mid east war will most likely end in a world economic crisis and possibly nuclear confrontation. Not to mention, an end to his vison of a reinvigorated America and even his presidency. 

Friday's thoughts on the past week.

 U.S. TO LOSE INVESTMENT DUE TO ISRAEL'S ATTACK

RUSSIA'S DRONES DID NOT TARGET POLAND

Unrest in France continues even after resignation of the PM and replacement. The problems in France are not going to be solved by replacing another PM. They could be lessened with a serious election change of direction, but it seems elections in Europe are more symbolic than real, this applies to the UK and Germany. We can expect escalation as their economies continue to weaken.

The great headlines concerning Russian Drones in Polish airspace are mostly just hopes by Ukraine of NATO intervention. These were decoy drones without munitions and were most likely sent off course as result of electronic warfare. One can expect that Ukraine may also at some time salvage Russian drones and then use them for a false attack.

It appears that Qatar is considering cancelling over $ 1 trillion in promised U.S. investment due to Israel's attack on their territory that caused the death of some of their citizens. It is reported that the UK refueled Israel's jets in midair and also oversaw this operation. It is understood that the U.S. knew of this and allowed the use of U.S. controlled airspace. Netanyahu is unapologetic and claims they will attack their enemies anywhere they choose. Most of the governments in the region have been attempting to be restrained in this ongoing conflict, but their populations are becoming increasingly enraged, sooner or later we can only expect escalation. 

In the Charlie Kirk assassination, one has to wonder how someone can enter a university building with a rifle and move to a roof top unnoticed. One can only conclude that this was planned for some time and the rifle may have been prepositioned with the help of university personnel. There are reports of coordinated diversions in the crowd that also gave the suspect time to escape.

The rumors of foreign players are everywhere, It is reported that Kirk is on Ukraine's infamous hit list, due to his criticism of Ukraine. Tucker Carlson and Scott Ritter are other Americans on this list.

Israel is also being talked about due to Kirk's connecting Epstein to Mossad and his criticism of Israeli policies. Only a real arrest of a suspect will end these speculations. If this is a domestic inspired shooter he will most likely be arrested. If it is a foreign inspired and directed one, he is most likely no longer in the country. If no arrest is made, it will cause unlimited speculation and conspiracy theories, possibly more damaging than even the tragic and despicable event. 

Silencing the opposition escalates.

 ASSASSINATION BECOMING NEW FORM OF SILENCING

DESPERATION WHEN LOSING THE DEBATE

Yesterday was a sad day, as we witnessed the assassination of a young man who appealed to the younger generation by encouraging an intellectual debate rather than the usual appeal of emotional reactions. Charlie Kirk's murder is an escalation of the ongoing attempts to stifle debate on college campuses.  The hegemony of the left on college campuses, which began in the 1950's and 60's, is under assault. The reality is the left is losing the debate and is desperate to silence those who challenge their supremacy by any means possible. 

While the assassin is still at large, we can assume this was not the usual lone deranged gunman.  The planning and likely assistance needed, at this time signifies, a more organized effort. It reminds us that we still have had little revealed about the Butler shooter and the other effort to assassinate Trump last year. This is while Trump is now head of the government.

The movement of the younger generation to a more conservative political position is not only happening on college campuses but because of the younger generation is rejecting previous sources of information. The younger generation most likely has never subscribed to a newspaper, a periodical or watches cable TV.  They are far more likely to be listening to or streaming Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, Jordon Peterson, Lex Friedman or many others who have far more watchers, than CNN, Fox or MSNBC. 

Most of these personalities also engage in live, in person, debates and speeches, a forum that makes them vulnerable to those who desire to engage in violent silencing. We can assume that those who desire to silence these people will be further encouraged by what has happened yesterday. Only time will tell if this type of silencing will work in their favor or further strengthen the appeal of the alternative sources of information.

Some of the attempts to control and silence debate on social media have been reversed. It has been proven that the FBI, CIA and foreign intelligence actively pursued such control in the last few years and we can only assume forces are still at work often by misinformation and disinformation in attempts to make the truth much harder to find. This is now a worldwide phenomenon, as the world is the process of a historical geopolitical change.

While yesterday's event hit home, we often don't take notice to the assassination attempts of the Slovak leader Fico, Khan in Pakistan and others in South America and the current 17 deaths of political opponents in Germany. Many of these attempts are encouraged by foreign states to further their political objectives. It seems Ukraine has connections to the Fico assassin and the potential golf course shooter of Trump The assassination of political leaders is now the preferred modus operandi of the state of Israel, who is willing to strike in any country in the world.

I expect these precedents will only be retaliated to, or copied by others, as those who have had a position of power are in the process of losing that power. 

Is Assassination now the new norm?

 NETANYAHU MAY NEED TO STAY IN A BUNKER

U.S CREDIBILITY TAKES ANOTHER HIT

Yesterday we saw that Israel proudly attempted to assassinate the Hamas negotiating team in Doha, Qatar. The negotiators were there to consider the Trump administrations ceasefire plan for Gaza. I expect this will end any attempt at any negotiation, not only for Gaza, but for most any conflict worldwide. 

We saw the Ukraine attack on the Russian strategic nuclear deterrent while negotiations were ongoing in Turkey. We saw Israel decapitate much of the leadership of Iran while Iran was in negotiations with the U.S. With this attack yesterday, we can only assume that this is the new policy of the U.S. and Israel. So far, none of these attacks have had any serious effect on ending any conflicts, but it may very well translate to ending conflicts in future, nearly impossible. Maybe that is the convoluted hope of amateur Machiavellians or out of control intelligence agencies.

We can only also assume that what is good for the goose is good for the gander, and if this is the new norm, we can expect lots assassinations in many diverse places. I suspect it will not be positive development for anyone. 

One must wonder what Israel is thinking, how is such an attack going to further their cause? I actually can not put my finger on what is their cause anymore. World public opinion it seems is irrelevant, does being a U.S. ally create the impression that opinion is no longer relevant. 

As for the U.S. what is the U.S. policy in all these attacks. Does it help plan, coordinate and endorse these policies? Are there rogue forces that allow these plans to go forward? So far, there is only weak, denials and attempts at deniability. If these plans are not green lighted by the white house, they better make that clear and those responsible made accountable. I suspect that the ability to engage in negotiations by the U.S. with anyone, both friends and foes, concerning anything, is being greatly diminished. Is that the real goal by those who advocate for these policies?

I suspect that the leadership of Israel does not want an end to this Gaza crisis, they want them all dead or gone, any way it can be accomplished. I suspect the same applies to the west bank. I still think a better approach would be raise the funds to buy these properties from those people, rather than spend it on bombs. At least then these people without options would have a nest egg to accomplish a voluntary resettlement.

As for Hamas, they have no choice but to fight to the last, as any surrender will  end in execution for anyone labeled as Hamas.  I suspect we will see the IDF enter Gaza and begin a systematic annihilation of everyone. It may be the end of Hamas, and probably Israel, as we know it. 

French government collapse, more to come?

NO CONFIDENCE VOTE MAY LEAD TO NEW ELECTIONS

PM OUT FOR ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL SPENDING

The current PM of France, Francois Bayrou has resigned after a no confidence vote from parliament. This followed protests about his plan to cut $52 billion in spending to address the increasing debt. He is the fourth Prime Minster to resign in the last 20 months. Macron says he will appoint a new Pm in the next few days. Protests are continuing with calls for Macron to resign and other grievances.

There is trouble in the major countries of the EU with rumblings in Germany with new elections coming up on Sept. 14 in Rhine-Westphalia region. 7 candidates of the AFD party have died in the last few weeks, all reportedly of natural causes, a statistical impossibility. Other parties have also suffered losses with the total for all now at 16 due to unexpected death. Chancellor Merz has rejected another $5 billion in aid to Ukraine and like France and UK, the government is at historic low popularity. One can expect serious changes are on the horizon in the EU.

The increasing debt, coupled with a loss of manufacturing jobs due to high energy costs and plans to increase military spending are all adding up to economic and political crisis. China and Russia just signed a huge pipeline deal, that both will cooperate in building, that will move the gas that was intended to serve Europe through the destroyed North Stream pipeline. It is likely that Europe may never restore its energy supplies from Russia. It will create conflict within by those who want to end fossil fuel and nuclear energy use and those who are becoming unemployed.

The calls by some to rearm Germany may be on ominous sign for the future of Europe. It will raise red flags internally and with Russia.

An end of the Ukraine conflict may have some relief in these countries but will also, if viewed as an EU and NATO defeat, raise other political and economic issues. This may be the most unsettled and dangerous periods for Europe since WW2.

Historic world order realignment inevitable.

 PEACEFUL TRANSITION, OR WAR?

CHANGES HAPPENING AT AN ACCELERATED PACE

Inevitable changes are underway, the question is, can there be a peaceful and mutually beneficial transition.  In the last week we witnessed India decide that if given a choice of refraining from buying oil from Russia or suffering increased tariff's from the U.S., it chose to keep buying energy from Russia. If this policy did not work with India it will not work with China or Brazil. I suspect that this will be the end of punitive tariffs as a bargaining tool for political purposes. 

At the same time, we see that the end of the dollar being the world reserve currency. Much of the world is transitioning to a system that settles transactions in 7 seconds and reduces costs. They can then periodically settle accounts with gold. It is expected that in the future there may be gold backed currency that is independent of national origins. While many like to portray that this is an attack on the US it is in realty the natural reaction to the irresponsible US policy of currency debasement. The dollar no longer is considered "As good as Gold".

We also are witnessing the crisis of "Democratic Socialism" in the western world. Massive debt, loss of manufacturing capacity, a weak work ethic and the inability to sustain the promised social benefits. This coupled with a policy of unlimited expenditures in an effort to rule the world is all unsustainable. Reforms and changes are either going to be by self will and consensus, or collapse and limited choices. 

We see that China, who is portrayed as a threat to US, is finding more countries willing to cooperate in a mutually beneficial economic atmosphere. China has been outperforming the west in its diplomacy. India is a perfect example, a country with a border with Russia and China, a mutually beneficial trade cooperation is viewed as better than an adversarial relationship. The same situation is growing with Japan, South Korea and even Australia. The much anticipated attack on Taiwan is not as likely as some would like to advertise, it too is in a similar situation.

Western Europe is failing, economically and politically. Its refusal to reverse course on the Ukraine war has put them on the road to economic ruin. There once favorable access to long contracts of Russian energy has disappeared, by their own choice, with no alternative in sight. This coupled with unrestrained immigration and short sighted environmental policies have place them in a precarious situation. It will take a change of political leadership to give any hope for a stable future.

These changes will not be avoided, but it can be a peaceful transition to a more realistic world order. The US. is in the enviable position of being shielded by two oceans, a potentially self sufficient economy with most of the needed resources. A loss of the world reserve currency will bring painful but needed fiscal responsibility back to the federal government. It will also require a military withdrawal from much of its foreign presence.  It will require a new reality of diplomacy and mutual respect in its dealings with other nations.

Quietly, some are envisioning a new era with spheres of influence, cooperating for  mutually economic prosperity. It is possible, but difficult, as there are forces that would rather continue confrontation and desire for hegemony rather than recognize mutual respect and others self interest. I expect we will witness which way all this will evolve.

EU, From common market to Socialist Autocracy.

 FROM PROMISES OF ECONOMIC PROSPERITY TO TOTAL CONTROL

MORE REGULATIONS THAN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION

The European Economic community was formed in 1957 by the treaty of Paris. Its founding members were France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg. Its purpose was to eliminate tariffs and restrictions on trade and promised prosperity for its members. It was successful at increasing trade and improving the economic well being of its members. It slowly expanded and the EU or European community was formed in 1993 with 12 members and has now expanded to 27 members. 

The EURO or European Currency Unit was formed in 1999 and actual coins and currency was issued in 2002. At that time there were 12 members. Adoption of the Euro, which members needed to reach certain economic balances, led to the liquidation of gold by prospective members and drop in the gold price to near $200,  only Britain refuses to adopt the new currency.

Since that time the Union has in effect created a massive regulatory bureaucracy. While it preaches democracy the leadership of the Union is actually appointed by a non democratic procedure. With the breakup of the Soviet Union many newly freed nations quickly joined the EU with the hope of  increasing their prosperity in exchange for their national sovereignty. Many lost their former industries like fishing in the Baltics due to regulation. Today they have very high taxes, massive regulation on every possible activity and a common policy on immigration and social engineering. It may have more central control and regulation than the former Soviet Union, but with a nice face.

Increasingly it has engaged in censorship and punitive actions against members who hope to preserve their cultural identify. Originally all members had veto power and that is under assault as they hope to bypass members who do not conform.  We see increased intervention in elections in an effort to strengthen control from Brussels.

The EU now seems bent on forming some type of European military structure that will be advertised as a defensive alliance, but may have the power to force conformity from members. I would expect severe penalties for any members who should decide to leave the union.

While the original members and real European powers formed this union the newly freed former soviet countries, in effect, traded their masters in Moscow for masters in Brussels. I suspect they should have avoided joining until they were better able to adjust and explore other options with better ability to control their destiny and preserve their freedom. Many have witnessed the flight of their educated and young to the major metropolitan centers and much of the rest of the country is made up of the old and poor. Many of their traditional industries have been eliminated by regulation.

It can be expected that big changes are on the horizon for the direction of the EU as its high unemployment, high taxes, inability to finance its social benefits and declining industrial base will require some serious reforms.

Is Trump easing the U.S. into accepting a multi-polar world?

 NOT WHAT HE SAYS, WHAT HE DOES

IN THE END, A MULTIPOLAR WORLD IS INEVITABLE

It is true,Trump's words are often contradictory and often cloud his intentions or indicate that there is no plan. For a better indication, one must stop looking with a magnifying glass and step back and look at a bigger picture, there are many examples.

The big meeting in Alaska with Putin is often characterized as meaningless and unproductive. While the Ukraine conflict continues, we can assume that decisions where in fact made. One, we stepped back from the edge of WW3 and there is at least some communication with Russia. We witnessed the coming to Washington of the EU and Zelensky and they immediately rejected the framework put forth by Putin and Trump. While we may hear talk of Washington escalation, it is unlikely, and I suspect Trump is going to focus on other priorities rather the Ukraine. The EU and Zelensky will not be ready until collapse is underway.  Russia is prepared to continue for years if necessary and neither the EU or Ukraine is in that position. 

In the middle east, everyone was outraged when Trump called for Israel to evacuate Gaza and then make Gaza into the Riviera of the region. This is exactly Netanyahu's plan and sadly for the residents, it is sort of giving Netanyahu more rope to meet his end. Israel has been at this for 2 years and there is no end in sight. Trump cannot politically confront Netanyahu, due to his base support by Israel supporters and Christians who hope for an end time conflict. A real tightrope of political maneuvering. 

As for Iran, it is clear that Trump let Israel  feel the effects of the 12 day war and then declared victory and attempted to move on. While it is all still brewing, how long can Israel keep this up, economically, politically and even militarily? 

Then there is the latest fiasco, the implementing of large tariffs on the buyers of Russian oil. This was a plan put forth by Lindsey Graham and the Senate that threatened to put this into law. It forced India to choose Russian trade or U.S. trade and they clearly chose to continue and even increase trade with Russia. I suspect that Graham and the Senate can only end this idea. 

This weekend we witnessed the meeting in China, a real lovefest of leaders who are moving into an alternative economic cooperation agreement that is most likely unstoppable. Maybe more will realize that the world has changed and the U.S. and western Europe can no longer force acceptance and  a continuation of the current order.

After listening to speeches by even Rubio and also Vance it is clear that they understand that the world has changed and sticks no longer work as well as carrots, the sooner that this reality becomes the consensus, the better off we all will be. We are not there yet, but any objective viewer should be able to conclude that cooperation and respect are needed to adapt to the changing world environment.

Can the Fed control interest rates on the debt?

 LOWERING FED RATES MAY ACTUALLY RAISE INTEREST ON DEBT

MARKETS CONTROL INTEREST RATE ON DEBT

In recent days we have heard that if the Fed lowers interest rates it will save the government on its interest rates on the debt. The fed rate is the rate for loans between banks and lowering them may help to stimulate the domestic economy, but will not directly affect the rate on the national debt. It is possible that lowering the fed rate will actually cause an increase in the interest on bonds as it may encourage buyers to pay less for those bonds and actually raise the yield or interest rate.

The massive deficits in the budget indicate that the government is increasing the money supply and this will cause less interest in bond buying and a rise in the yield. At present the 10 year is yielding 4.279% and the 30 year is 4.974%. At present the interest rate on the debt is becoming the biggest part of the budget and it is going to get bigger, because their is no way that these deficits can be reduced in the short term.  Raising taxes will cause economic decline and cutting spending will have the same effect. 

Of course uncertainty and prospects of war and other political disruptions will also cause an increasing or decreasing demand for bonds and will also raise or lower yields or interest rates on the debt.

It is a dilemma and only an increase in productivity and creating of wealth can increase revenues without negatively affecting the economy. While that is possible it may take a long time to change that dynamic. Increasing wealth and a restraint on spending is the only way to move to a more positive outcome. At present it seems there is no national consensus by anyone to take the required steps to change the direction of these factors.

Chip war escalation or China self sufficiency?

 CHIP COMPANIES IN FOR A ROUGH ROAD

CHINA MAY HOLD THE BEST CARDS

Last week, we saw the U.S. government purchase a 10% stake in INTEL, the premier U.S. technology company. This is in effect a bailout, as this company and other U.S. chip manufacturers are feeling the effects of the effort to restrict sales of their products to China, it is likely to get a lot worse in the near future. China has recently banned the import of chips from the U.S. around 40% their business.

This began under the Biden administration, when U.S. companies were restricted from selling sophisticated chips to China, it was labeled a nation security action.  China responded by building a massive modern technology park and soon was selling the bread and butter chips that are used in auto's, appliances and other electronics at a reduced price, making U.S. manufactures uncompetitive and taking much of their business and placing them in a serious financial bind. China is now set to become self sufficient in chip manufacturing and is working on making those sophisticated chips for AI and military applications.

The most recent escalation concerns ASML, a Dutch company, the only manufacturer of the latest photolithography equipment. China has been a customer for years and has made up 27% of ASML's business around $10 billion in 2025. The U.S. has now pressured ASML to not only end sales to China but to cancel its service contracts with China. China it seems is done with this and is now informing ASML that they have breached their commercial contract and they desire to return all their machinery and expect $28 billion in refunds.  Rather than go through years of litigation and hoop jumping China is also informing ASML that if they don't comply, their contracts with China also make their patents and copyrights null and void, indicating that China is now prepared and possibly equipped to copy all of ASML's latest equipment, a development that would have dramatic effects on the chip business worldwide.

We have seen how restrictions on exports of targeted items by western countries has backfired, an indication of who is actually dependent on who. Japan lost billions of exports to China of machine tools after being pressured by the U.S. to restrict certain tools. China has either made them themselves or found another source. China has ended its purchase of U.S. grains and are now buying them elsewhere. China has also restricted its sales of rare-earths, another retaliation. It is becoming a long list and is going to have severe consequences on many businesses. 

China is also developing a new type of chip, based on Indium Selenide, that will address the limitations of silicon chips, It is a new technology, with much more expensive materials and China has reported they have been successful at making this work, but only at the laboratory level. If able to produce this product it would be superior for high end uses. 

While hoping to replace China business with domestic manufacturing may be sound idea, it will probably take decades if actually possible at all. In the meantime the trade disputes are leading to a new world were the west could be isolated from the developing world, as more countries opt out of taking sides.