Spanish speaking residents are natural republican constituency

LATINO COMMUNITY REFUSE TO BE PUT INTO RACIAL BOX 

DEMOCRATS WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THEM DEPENDENT AND POOR

There has been much talk about appealing to the Spanish speaking citizens of the country. Democrats have attempted for decades to classify them as some sort of racial entity. This strategy has worked fairly well with African American community. The idea is to keep these groups feeling they are victims and that the democrats are going to protect them. This strategy has kept anyone who embraces it dependent and likely a future of poverty and failure.

The Spanish speaking constituency is racially diverse. There common denominator is that they or their recent ancestors were part of the Spanish empire and spoke Spanish. They are a mixture of European, particularity Spanish, and native Americans. In fact many of my own relatives have lived in Brazil for over a hundred years. They are of Hungarian and German descent.

What many of these citizens have in common is that they have a strong belief in the nuclear family. Democrats have been moving for decades to encourage policies to destroy the nuclear family and now many outright consider family some sort of privilege. Without an intact family, the odds of descending into poverty and failure increase dramatically.

Spanish speaking resident who have had an experience of living under totalitarian socialism in Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua have become strong Republican voters. They have lived under the results of Democrat policy. The Democratic party has been moving in all respects for total government control of all aspects of life. This includes the economy, housing, energy use, food production, social experimentation and social manipulation, and even what someone might be thinking or communicating.

Spanish speaking resident generally have a strong work ethic, pride in their work, with many entrepreneurs and small businessmen and women. Democrat policy is detrimental to any self employed or small business owners or workers. The Democrat  obsession with regulation and micro control make being self-employed much more difficult.  

Spanish speaking residents often have a strong religious belief. The left focus their belief on the state. The state is the religion of the left. The state will decide what is moral or immoral, what is good or bad. This has now progressed into open hostility to traditional religion.

Democrats have been pushing unlimited immigration and an open border policy, many Spanish speaking left their natural homes to legally come to America and understand if this policy is successful they will be living under the same conditions that forced them to leave.

The Democrat strategy of victim hood, is a recipe for failure. If you feel you are a victim, you will likely never be a valuable or productive employee. Good employees can advance, make more money, own homes and have pride in their accomplishments. Often then venture out on their own and build businesses and provide jobs for others.

People with a victim mentality are destined to poverty, failure and unhappiness, the natural Democrat constituency, that is used to keep the elite in positions of power and wealth. 

Citizens with a pride in their work, self reliant, with a strong family network and positive attitude are the natural Republican constituency. The majority of the Spanish community have those cultural traits that will lead them to a future of success and happiness.

Originally published 11/10/2020

 

Opportunity for Biden to be a real President.

BIDEN HINTS AT A UKRAINE AGREEMENT 

CAN HE BUCK THE LEFT, RIGHT AND DEEP STATE

After his conversation with Vladimir  Putin, Joe Biden hinted that an accommodation could be possible in the Ukraine. Just the hint of a change of direction in U.S. foreign policy has already brought out the naysayers. So far it has been the Republicans who have criticized the possibility of an agreement satisfactory to all parties. You can bet you will soon hear from the left who still consider Russia a traitor to their cause.

Then there will be the behind the scenes viscous undermining from the Bureaucrats in the state department and CIA. 

Biden could change the direction of our foreign policy if has the backbone to take on the opposition. He could also prove that he really is the president rather than just a cut-out for those behind the scenes. Most of all he could engineer a deal that would be in the best interest of Ukraine, Russia and Europe.

Some of the possibilities are that in exchange for the sovereignty and border integrity of Ukraine Nato would pledge not to include Ukraine in their military alliance. Ukraine would be granted trade status with the EU and also Russia. This would allow Ukraine to prosper economically as never before, it would also enable Russia to continue to have Ukraine as a security buffer. This could allow for normalization of relations between these two interdependent countries. Ukraine could become sort of a new Switzerland.

A U.N monitored referendum could be held in Crimea to determine the future status of this contested region. It would have to be without foreign interference. All polls have indicated that the citizens of Crimea would choose to stay part of Russia.

If such a deal could be put together it would allow for more cooperation between the EU, the U.S. and Russia. This would be a giant step in dealing with our true threat Communist China.

To pull off such a deal Biden could expect some support from some Republicans like Rand Paul, the progressives may see it as a way of saving a sinking Biden presidency. The EU should be willing to allow trade with Ukraine as this would assure their energy needs and eliminate the possibility of military conflict next door. Such a deal would contain the Russians who do not want any more NATO expansion.

The biggest opposition will be the architects of our decades long failed foreign policy. They would rather see war than admit their policies have been a dismal failure.

Biden Administration: symbolism over substance.

ALL ABOUT TALKING POINTS AND HEADLINES 

NO NEW THOUGHTS OR ACTION ON ANYTHING

We see the attempt to rehabilitate the Biden presidency. The Media allies have been upping the ante on positive headlines and talking points, but accomplishments or new thinking is non-existent.

We see images of his video phone call with Putin. It is messaged that he gave Putin a strong warning. WOW. This is not about warnings or threats, it is about finding a solution that would be in the best interest of Ukraine and all of Europe. Biden has no plan or option to get off this track to war. He cannot re evaluate our containment policy for Russia and come to an agreement that all can accept. He cannot go against the thoughtless decades old policy developed by our state department. 

Then there is our problems with China, wow, we are going to politically boycott the Olympics, just more symbolism over substance. Talk about rights for their minority population, more symbolism, but nothing to change the direction of the chinese communist party.

Nothing about stopping their theft of out defense and technology. Nothing about making our country self sufficient from Chinese products. Nothing about bringing manufacturing and real jobs back to the United States. China is a creation of the United States trade policy, not a word, except reversing any inroads the Trump administration might have gained. He would rather focus in making Americans more dependent on Federal government handouts, Why would they need jobs?

Biden has accepted that fossil fuels must go, with no plan to replace these energy sources. He is placing us in a very vulnerable economic and security position, then acts as though he is doing something by begging Russia and Opec to up production, at the same time threatening to cut off the use of Russian gas. The Europeans must be shaking their heads in amazement.

He claims he is returning to the remain in Mexico policy, but likely it is just a talking point to ignore the crisis on the border. He will not stop the flow of immigrants into this country.

His plan for a nuclear Iran is a rehash of the last failed plan that even Iran is not interested in redoing, all the while his administration and his media allies are ignoring the Israeli preparations for war. We may be on the verge of an all out conflict in the middle east and this country is focused on build back better, forced vaccinations and a continuing political fishing expedition into their political enemies.

Is this administration truly fiddling as the world is about to erupt in flames?

Ukraine will not become a member of NATO without WAR.

 UKRAINE JUST A PAWN IN GLOBAL POLITICAL CHESS

UKRAINE SHOULD BE A NEUTRAL INDEPENDENT COUNTRY

We hear that Biden is going to talk to Vladimir Putin today. He has stated that he does not recognize any red lines placed by Russia. If he continues to insist that Ukraine will become member of NATO, he  may as well not call.

Volodymyr Zelinsky campaigned that he would improve relations with Russia, but it was not long that he was spouting demands and and has adopted the U.S. policy toward Russia and Ukraine. The best situation for Ukraine is that it would be an independent, non-aligned nation with an ability to trade with the EU and Russia. It could prosper economically and not be a threat to the security of Russia. If he continues to allow his foreign policy to be dictated by Washington it will likely be a disaster for Ukraine.

It is clear that most of the career Washington bureaucrats are unwilling to entertain any other view of foreign policy than the one this country has been stuck in for decades. Many are still engaged in a cold war mentality of the past.

After the break-up of the Soviet Union, there was a sincere effort by the Russian federation to become a part of the world economic and political system. Just look at the State department's list of treaties signed in those days. While the political leaders of the time, Reagan, Gorbachev and Bush were committed to moving in that direction, the entrenched bureaucracy decided the cold war must go on. 

NATO was established in 1949 as a counter to the Soviet Union and the Warsaw pact, a cooperative group of communist countries. It originally had 12 members, 4 members were added between 1949 and 1982. this brought the number to 16.

When the Berlin wall was taken down and eventually the unification of Germany was agreed to by the Western countries and the Russian federation there were 16 NATO members. There was an agreement, but not a treaty, that Germany could be part of NATO but further expansion would not happen.

After the Soviet Union break-up the NATO confederation's reason for existing was less clear. There no longer was a serious threat of an invasion of western Europe from the unified Soviet Union. The Russian Federation was going through a peaceful transformation to a more open and free political and economic union.

The Russian federation was no longer a communist country and had given up on their goal of establishing a world communist revolution. While they struggled to transform themselves from inside, U.S. and Russian relations were at a high point.

Then it was argued by some, and sometimes openly touted, that the U.S. was the only world Super Power and that we should use this opportunity to enforce our economic and political will on the World. Russia was often disdained and insulted by politicians on both sides.

In 1997, 3 former Warsaw pact members were invited to join NATO. Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia were admitted to the union in 1997. That is exactly 24 years ago. Today NATO has 29 members, 17 more than at the critical time of the cold war. 

Did anyone consider that this policy of "Containment" of Russia, which is now the official policy of the United States, would be cause for concern to the leaders of the Russian Federation and its citizens. This is really were the deterioration of relations with Russia took a turn for the worse.

In 2014 a revolution in the Ukraine was instrumental in the removal of Victor Yanukovych from the presidency of  Ukraine. The main issue was that many wanted Yanukovych to become a member of the European community. The United States was heavily involved, with Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland admitting to funneling $5 Billion in support for the overthrow of Yanukovych. Tours and speeches by John McCain and other politicians encouraged the Ukrainians to revolt.

The problem was that 50% of all trade of the Ukraine was conducted with the Russian Federation. As a member of the E.U., Ukraine would be forbidden to trade with Russia. The other issue was that much of Russia's military industry was located in eastern Ukraine. There was even talk of replacing the Russian Naval base in Crimea with a NATO naval base.This was a serious threat to the economy and security of the Russia federation.

Within days of the coup, parts of eastern Ukraine revolted from the new government and Crimea held a referendum to be reunited with the Russian federation. This led to sanctions and the beginning of the intensified cold war.

This was just the first of the U.S. policy of support of revolution or regime change, it was followed by U.S. involvement in revolution in Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq and the interference in the elections in Israel and Russia. Not one of these interventions resulted in a positive result for the countries in question or the United States. These interventions have resulted in the death of 100's of thousands in these countries. It has also cost the U.S. over $7 Trillion and thousands of deaths of U.S. citizens.

Having created chaos in much of the world one must wonder if they have now turned their expertise in chaos to their latest project, right here at home.

In April of 2019 Volodymyr Zelensky, a non politician, won the election over Petro Poroshenko the incumbent and the favored candidate of the U.S. establishment. In May President Trump recalled the ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, after reports that she was an ardent Poroshenko supporter and had refused to talk to the new president. One must wonder what the establishment experts had in mind for poor Zelensky.

Ukraine is now a partitioned country. If anyone believes that Russia will allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO and be a hostile player on their border is delusional. Just as we would feel if Mexico would decide to join a union opposed to our well-being. This is the policy supported by the U.S. foreign policy experts.

So today, Biden is likely to warn Putin that we will impose sanctions and other economic penalties on Russia, if they invade Ukraine. What he should be doing is considering a peaceful transition of Ukraine into an independent, non-aligned nation with trade ability with all its neighbors. Biden is likely to spout the policy of his entrenched advisors and insist on Nato membership for Ukraine. The U.S. has not encouraged a relationship of cooperation, but constant derision and animosity toward Russia, who now understands that short of submission, there is no other option to be offered.

A free independent Ukraine, that would have the ability to trade with who ever is in its best interests. If this is not possible there will be a permanent partition of Ukraine, with the eastern part, who has mostly a Russian population, closely aligned with Russia. 

It is likely that if the pressure to squeeze and encircle  Russia continues and if it feels its national interests are severely threatened, War may be viewed as their only alternative.

Roe vs Wade hysteria.

 ROE VERDICT, CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF JUDICIAL OVERREACH

ACTIVIST COURTS CREATE UNNECESSARY DIVISION

Much is being made of the coming decision on a Mississippi law that limits abortion to the first 15 weeks of pregnancy.  Many are anticipating that the court is going to reverse the infamous 1973 abortion ruling. While abortion has probably been practiced for several thousand years of human history, this ruling found a constitutional right to abortion. The justices claimed that this was part of the fourth amendment right to privacy. The fourth amendment reads: 

 "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"

While the court has a lot of work that they should be doing to protect this right, the right of abortion has never been a constitutional right. Whether the court will overturn Roe is not clear, if that should be the case, it will not stop the ability to obtain an abortion in this country. There are four possible outcomes in this case.

1. The court may limit its ruling to upholding the Mississippi law and go no further, that will result in the court having to hear more state laws forever.

2. The court may reverse Roe and that would result in many state laws, eliminating, restricting or expanding abortion.

3 and 4. If Roe is overturned then there is the proper and legal method of proposing a constitutional amendment to either legalize abortion with clear rules or outlaw abortion. It is unlikely that such an amendment could be passed to legalize or outlaw abortion. So, the result would be, as it should have been from day one, that is falls into the 10th amendment situation were it is left up to the states.

That would be the best ruling for the country, it would remove abortion from federal politics, both parties would now possibly be able to focus on more pressing issues that are constitutionally federal issues.

The states would work out their own ways to deal with this issue and relieve much of the internal battling over abortion. Individuals desiring an abortion will likely be within several hours of finding a state to satisfy their needs. 

States rights is the great pressure relief valve for the country, it should be re-invigorated if we all desire to peacefully preserve the union. It gives us a 50 state laboratory to see what works and what does not. We should all insist that the federal government retreat into those functions given it by the constitution and bill of rights. A federal government with total power and control will be an oppressive government and will destroy America as we know it.

Murder facts USA.

 10 CITIES ACCOUNT FOR 25 % OF ALL MURDERS

52% OF MURDER VICTIMS ARE BLACK, 43.5% WHITE

After 25 years of declining murder rates the last few years have again seen a rising number of murders in the USA. Major cities are the source of a large percentage of the murders. 10 cites account for 25% of all murders. These cities are Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Houston, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Dallas, Kansas City and Indianapolis. 

Of the over 14,000 murders, 39% resulted from arguments and romantic triangles.

24.7 % were committed during a felonious act.

782 by law enforcement.

429 of those killed by law enforcement were felons.

353 killed by private citizens during a felonious act and  self defense.

52% of victims were African american.

43.5% of victims were white.

54.7% of perpetrators were black.

43 % were white.

28% of victims knew their attacker.

12.5% were family members.

80 % of white victims were killed by white assailants.

16% of white victims were killed by black assailants.

88..5 % of black victims were killed by black assailants.

8.9 % of black victims were killed by white assailants.

These numbers are from FBI statistics. Hopefully it will add a little perspective to what we see in the media.

Originally published 4/12/21

Democrat politicians responsible for death and mayhem.

MORE JAILS AND MORE PROSECUTIONS NEEDED

FOCUS ON REAL CRIMINALS NOT POLITICAL ENEMIES 

We see the racist domestic terrorism act in Wisconsin, which killed 6 and injured over 4 dozen, pushed to the back burner, but the fake January 6 investigation is the daily talking point. We see where there is a no  prosecutions policy for retail theft or vandalism that has cost private business millions, but no bail and solitary confinement for anyone who is considered a political enemy of the left. 

Democrat elected officials, Governors, Mayors, District Attorneys are all responsible for hundreds of lives and uncountable million in property losses. Protecting the lives and property of citizens should be their first priority, but it is clear political prosecutions and any other activity that enhances their political advantage is their only priority. 

The black, black lives matter advocate, who was out on bail, and should have been in jail for decades was able to kill and maim innocent white folks in a christmas parade, due to their intentional goal of creating as much chaos and instability as possible. 

The policies of big city mayors have cost hundreds of lives and destroyed much of the business in their cities, allowing unlimited retail looting, letting violent criminals out on bail or no bail and emptying their prisons of violent felons. This can only be intentional, no one is that stupid or incompetent.

We see them look away as rioters and looters who they consider their constituents and supporters are given a free reign, then watch as they threaten parents at school board meetings and other protesters who oppose them as white supremacists and domestic terrorists.

First they need to punish all violent offenders severally, keep them locked up and build new and more prisons if necessary. The statistics are all there from when they passed, "3 strikes your out"  laws in the 1990's, violent crime plummeted and stayed down until recently when Democrat elected official embarked on their policy of creating death and mayhem. the politicians in Wisconsin responsible for letting the parade attacker out should all be fired or remove from office.

This recent increase in violent crime can be stopped, but the longer it is encouraged by Democrat politicians the harder it will be and the more innocent live lost.