What is going on at the FBI?

COMEY RAISES MORE QUESTIONS THAN PROVIDES ANSWERS.

RELEASE OF MORE INFORMATION NOW REQUIRED

 

On Friday, 11 days before the election, FBI director sent a letter to Congressional oversight members that new e-mails have been found that are relevant to the Clinton private server investigation. This letter, without any reference to the actual e-mails, raises more questions about what is going on behind the scenes at the FBI and Justice Department.

 

There have been rumors for months, that rank and file members of the FBI have been on the verge of revolting in mass due to Director Comey's handling of the investigation of the Clinton private server. Did Comey send this letter to quell the possibility of mass resignations or leaking of information by FBI agents? Did Comey send this letter to force the Justice department to let these e-mails be released? Does the New York police department have access to these e-mails, and did this require he make a reference to the emails before they are leaked by them to preserve the integrity of the FBI? Is Anthony Weiner using his access to these e-mails to give him a bargaining chip in his own legal problems and divorce? The existence of these e-mails without the knowledge of the FBI raises more questions about the quality of the investigation by the FBI.

 

Whatever the reason, Comey cannot just let this lie until after the election. There must be one hell of a fight going on between the FBI, the Justice Department, Obama administration, and of course the Clinton campaign. Some are calling for Comey's resignation. That would probably make the whole matter worse. It is now time for this whole matter to be made public by someone, the truth is what is needed. It is in the best interest of the country for transparency in this matter.

 

This results of this investigation were delayed until a critical period after the primary was concluded. The whole thing stinks from a cover up by the Obama Administration, the FBI and the Justice department. This whole business should have been on a fast track to come to an honest conclusion early in the election cycle. If Clinton had broken the law, the democrats could have had an honest candidate, not tainted by corruption. Bernie Sanders was an honest candidate, while I don't support most of positions, I felt he was not corrupt and would not be selling his office to the highest bidder. I think he would have worked for what he felt was the best interest of the American people. The corrupt rigged democratic primary allowed this to happen.

 

The real questions are: Did Hillary Clinton install a private server to bypass the Federal Records act? If so, she has committed a crime.  Did Hillary Clinton have her server and email devices destroyed after she received a subpoena to hand over and preserve these records. If so, she has committed  felony obstruction of justice. If that is the case she should have been indicted, and if elected president, she will spend years in investigations and possibly impeachment. This is a ridiculous situation for the country. This has all been caused by the Clinton paranoia and inability to play by the rules. If she would have been forthright about all of this, she may have been able to put it all behind her early on.  She has started the process that has brought into question the integrity of the FBI, the Justice Department, and the election process itself, all because of her actions.